Why don’t we have remote controlled tanks? Is that a bad idea? Why or why not?

How about a remote controlled flame tank.

Although we currently have remote-controlled reconaissance vehicles, these devices depend for much of their defensive capability on stealth – to perform their function without being detected. Remaining undetected difficult for an offensive weapon to accomplish for long. Once such a vehicle is detected, it is subject to attack, or at least more effective attack, by the enemy. To remain effective, the vehicle must be able to repel such attacks or to withstand them, and still perform its function.

A remote-controlled tank must also do a lot more than a reconaissance vehicle, such as identify a target, aim at it, destroy it, navigate through changing terrain, and maintain contact with the base. This requires a lot of on-board intelligence or a lot of real-time sensory equipment and an elaborate communication channel to send this information and receive the necessary control signals in real time.

There is also the possibility for the enemy to capture such a vehicle and turn it against its original controllers. This must also be guarded against.

Flobots – Handlebars (ALBUM/RADIO VERSION HQ)

Related Blogs

• Nike 6.0 Women’s Apparel and Footwear: Fall ’10 | NikeBlog.com
• TVS Flame 125 cc Test Ride and Review | VickyConnect Expert Reviews
• Troubleshooting low or yellow flame output on a Barbeque Grill | BarbequeLovers.com